You know, this is just a thought; back in the 1980's, tanning beds did not have the very short exposure times that we do now. Most beds were 30 minutes and HP were up to 60 minutes (30 min on each side) Which more closely mimics natural sunlight.
Could this rush to shorter sessions and stronger lamps may have caused some of this backlash against the indoor tanning industry? Should we be going back to the longer sessions instead of what we have done?
Don't get me wrong. I believe that tanning equipment is safe if used properly, but when you get into a open sun 1050 for 8 minutes....
Could this rush to shorter sessions and stronger lamps may have caused some of this backlash against the indoor tanning industry? Should we be going back to the longer sessions instead of what we have done?
Don't get me wrong. I believe that tanning equipment is safe if used properly, but when you get into a open sun 1050 for 8 minutes....